[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Parshas
Matos
Rabbi Yosef Kalatsky, Shlita
Dean
Yad Avraham Institute
1.
Understanding the Power of Speech
The Torah states, If a man takes a vow to Hashem or swears an
oath to establish a prohibition upon himself, he shall not desecrate
(chillul) his word; according to whatever comes from his mouth shall
he do. The Torah teaches us that ones word is sacred and
that if one makes a vow or an oath the ramifications of breaking it
are severe. If one violates his oath, he is subject to the court-imposed
penalty of lashes. We see from this that our speech is powerful and
binding.
There are many mitzvahs, which require verbalization. For example the mitzvos
of the recitation of the Shema, daily Tefillah, (prayer -Amidah), Berchas
HaMazon (Grace after meals), etc. all require one to verbalize them
in order to fulfill ones obligation. If one only mediated the Shema
or did not verbalize the Amidah one does not fulfill his obligation.
If one wants to make a vow or an oath one also needs to articulate it
in order for it to take affect. Thinking a vow or an oath without verbalization
has no value whatsoever and therefore is not binding.
Regarding, Lashon Hara (Evil Speech) and Rechilus (Tale Bearing) one usually violates
it when he verbalizes his criticisms of others when they have no constructive
value. The Gemara in Tractate Arachin states, "The magnitude
of the sin of one who speaks lashon hara is more serious than
one who violates three cardinal sins. Meaning that there is a certain
aspect of evil, which lies within Lashan Hara, which is more serious.
The Gemara in Tractate Shevuos tells that if one violates his vows,
one of the possible ramifications of this transgression is that his
wife and children could pass away. We see from this passage of the
Gemara that if one violates his speech in these contexts the consequences
could be tragic (G-d forbid). What lies in the power of speech that
makes it so potent?
The only species that has the ability to speak and express their intellect
is the human being. The Torah tells us that G-d said to His heavenly
retinue, Let us create Man in our image and form. The Torah continues
and says G-d blew into Mans nostrils a Soul of life, thus becoming
a living creature. Targum Unkolus (Aramaic translation of Unkolus)
explains the meaning of living creature means a speaking spirit.
We see from the Torah that Mans ability to express himself through
speech is only as a result of the infusion of a soul. Therefore speech
is an statement of our spirituality. The essence of the human being
is a spiritual species contained within a physical body.
Regarding
vows, the Torah states, he shall not desecrate
(chillul) his word. Evidently, the inference of the word
desecrate indicates that there is an aspect of sacredness to ones
speech. Therefore violating ones word is considered a desecration.
Now we can understand that if one expends the power of speech inappropriately
such as Lashan Hara and Rechilus or if one violates his vow or oath
the consequences are dire.
If
the power of speech is an outgrowth of our spirituality it is clear
and understood that it must be invested in areas of our spirituality.
Therefore in order to fulfill our obligation of the Shema it is not
sufficient to mediate it but rather it must be declared verbally. In
terms of affecting our spirituality and the spirituality of the world,
verbal statement is needed. As the Torah tells us, G-d created existence
through verbal statement. The Torah states, G-d
said, Let there be light etc. As the Mishna in Pirke
Avos tells us, existence came about through the Ten Utterances of
G-d. Just as existence manifested itself only through the power of
G-ds speech, so too to be effective as spiritual beings we must express
our obligations through the articulation of our speech.
Reb.
Chaim of Volozin ztl in the Nefesh HaChaim explains that the word Chillul
comes from the word Challal that means void or vacuum. He explains
that a Chillul Hashem is when we behave as if Hashem is absent from
this existence. When one publicly violates Hashems Will it is considered
a Chillul Hashem because the person is conducting himself as if Hashem
did not exist (G-d forbid). We see that the Torah uses the word Chillul
regarding violating ones vow - he shall not desecrate (chillul)
his word. It is possible that the Torah means that when
one violates his vow it is also as if G-d does not exist for that person
because violating his word is not recognizing that his power of speech
emanates from his spirituality.
If
a person would only understand the value of speech he would be more
cognizant regarding its expenditure. One would pray differently and
express himself in a more responsible manner.
2. By
what Standard are We Judged?
The
Torah states, Hashem spoke to Moshe saying, Take vengeance
for the Children of Israel against the Midianites; afterward you will
be gathered unto your people (Moshe will pass away).
Rashi cites the Chazal (Sifre) which states that despite the fact
that Moshe understood that he was going to pass away after fulfilling
the commandment of destroying the Midianites, he nevertheless performed
the Mitzvah with joy and he did not delay. If Moshe had decided not
to act immediately upon the dictate of Hashem, he would have extended
his life.
The
Midrash extols Moshe by stating, we see the praiseworthiness of Moshe
that his response was without delay. The inference of the Midrash is
that this level of clarity, which Moshe achieved, was even praiseworthy
for a person at his level. Moshes level of prophecy was one of a kind,
as the Torah tells us He prophesized in an awake-state and not in a
sleep-state as other prophets and G-ds communication with him was
face to face (as one speaks to a peer). Despite this exceptional level
of clarity and understanding Moshe could have chosen to delay the battle
to extend his own life. If this was Moshes level of understanding,
why do the Chazal tell us that his choice to go to battle is considered
praiseworthy it should have been obvious to Moshe?
The
Torah states in the Portion of Shelach, Send for yourself
men (spies). The Ohr HaChaim HaKadosh explains the meaning
of the words for yourself means that it is in the best interest of
Moshe to send the spies because if the Jewish people would enter into
the Land immediately, Moshe would have to pass away. However, if the
Jews, because of their lack of faith as a result of believing the reports
of the spies, Moshes life was extended an additional thirty-nine years.
During this period of time the Jews benefited greatly from Moshes presence,
influence and continuous transmission of Torah. The Jewish people were
brought to another level because of Moshes presence.
It
is stated in the Book of Devarim that the Jews will not engaged in idolatry
until after the passing of Moshe. Rashi in his commentary cites the
Midrash, which asks that the Jews only became idolaters after the passing
of Yehoshua Bin Nun, the student of Moshe, and not immediately after
the passing of Moshe. The Midrash answers that we learn from this that
as long as Moshes disciple Yehoshuah Bin Nun was alive it was as if
Moshes own influence was still present. The Talmud tells us that the
face of Moshe is compared to the sun and the face of Yehoshuah is compared
to the moon. Meaning that although Yehoshuah was qualified to be the
successor of Moshe to lead the Jews into the Promised Land, he was nevertheless
only a reflection of his rebbe (as the moon reflects the light of the
sun). Therefore Moshes conflict could have been- that since his continued
presence would have enhanced the spirituality of the Jewish people to
a greater degree, he could have justified delaying the war with the
Midianites. Nevertheless he chose not to delay and he is therefore extolled
for his decision.
Yehoshua
Bin Nun, the successor of Moshe Rabbeinu, led the Jewish people into
the Land of Israel. Hashem commanded him upon entry to conquer the
land and divide it among the tribes. Yehoshua believed that after the
land was divided and the Jews were settled in Israel that he would pass
away. He therefore delayed dividing the land in order to extend his
life. Because he understood that as long as he would be alive the Jews
would not engage in idol worship. The Midrash tells us that initially
he was meant to live 120 years like his Rebbe Moshe; however, because
of his delay, Hashem shortened his life by ten years. It is understood
that Yehoshuahs delay was purely for the sake of Hashem because he
knew that as long as he was alive the Jews would not engage in idol
worship. Nevertheless because of this delay, he had ten years taken
from his life.
The
difficulty is if Chazal tell us that even for a person as great as Moshe
Rabbeinu that his decision (not to delay) would have not been a claim
against him why was Yehoshuah punished for his decision to delay?
Why is he culpable for a decision that was considered praiseworthy
even for Moshe Rabbeinu? How do we understand this?
The answer is that there was no one with the clarity and understanding
of Moshe Rabbeinu. Although the decision not to delay is considered
praiseworthy (even for a person as great as Moshe); nevertheless,
once Moshe established the proper behavior and protocol in this given
circumstance, he established a precedent to be followed without deviation.
When Moshe went to war against the Midianites, he established that one
should not take into account what he personally considers as being in
the best interest of the Jewish people, but rather one must follow the
Will of Hashem. When Hashem gives a Commandment, it should be fulfilled
without delay despite the consequences that we may believe will follow.
Yehoshua should have followed Moshe Rabbeinus precedent that had been
established as proper protocol. He should have not delayed regardless
of how pure his intent may have been. Because of this failing, Hashem
shortened his life.
There
are many instances where we want to establish what is right or wrong
vis--vis our own lives. We are very often conflicted and even convoluted
to the point to have any semblance of clarity. Regardless of our mindset,
the Halachic standard (Law) has been set through precedents in virtually
any situation. We must follow the Law regardless of what we think it
should be. Although our intent may be pure and altruistic there is no
room to compromise on the Torah Law. This is why the Mishna in Pirkei
Avos (Ethics of our Fathers) teaches us, Make for yourself a Rav..
(Mentor). A Rav is a Torah personality who has a level of clarity
because of his proficiency in Torah Law and is therefore able to advise
people in their lives in proper manner. If we follow this prescription
of life, despite our limitation, we will be directed along the proper
path.
3. We
All Have a Responsibility to One Another
The
Torah in the Portion of Maasei presents us the laws regarding the person
who kills inadvertently. If a person inadvertently kills another individual
and the Sanhedrin (the Court of Israel) rules that the killing came
about as a result of negligence, the murderer must flee to a City of
Refuge. If he should leave the City of Refuge he can be killed by the
closest relatives of the murder victim avenging the blood of the deceased.
He must remain in the City of Refuge until the passing of the Kohen
Gadol (High Priest). Once the High Priest passes away, the inadvertent
murderer no longer needs the protection of the City of Refuge and he
is considered fully atoned for the murder.
The
Gemara in Tractate Makkos asks Why is it only after the passing of
the Kohen Gadol that the murder is released from his captivity? What
is the connection between the Kohen Gadol and the inadvertent murderer?
The examples given in the Torah of the accidental killings are -if a
one throws a stone into a forest and it accidentally kills someone or
if while chopping wood either a splinter shoots out and kills a person
in the proximity of the wood chopper or if the ax flies off of its handle
and kills a person within its proximity the individuals who are the
cause of these accidents must flee to the City of Refuge. The Talmud
asks in all of these tragic situations what is the culpability of the
Kohen Gadol? The Gemara answers that if the Kohen Gadol would have
prayed sufficiently on behalf of the Jewish people such a tragedy would
not have occurred. The Mercy of Hashem would have caused the woodchopper
or the stone-thrower to be more cognizant of his actions and thus would
avert this tragedy. Another way the Mercy of Hashem would have averted
the tragedy is if the person (who fell victim to these irresponsible
actions) would not have been in the proximity of the wood being chopped
or the stone being thrown. It was only because the Kohen Gadol did
not fulfill his obligation to pray for Mercy for his generation sufficiently
that he is held culpable.
The
Gemara presents a situation in which a person inadvertently killed prior
to the appointment of the Kohen Gadol and the Sanhedrin judges the murderer
guilty only after the Kohen Gadol was appointment. Despite the fact
that tragedy had already taken place before the Kohen Gadol was appointed,
the halacha (law) is that the inadvertent murderer must remain in the
City of Refuge until the passing of the Kohen Gadol. The Gemara asks
Why is the Kohen Gadol culpable to any degree in this situation if
the tragedy had already taken place? The Gemara answers that although
the murder had already taken place, the ruling of the Sanhedrin could
have been that the murderer is found innocent rather than guilty.
Since the Court found the inadvertent murderer guilty (who had to flee
to the City of Refuge), there is culpability to the Kohen Gadol because
he should have prayed sufficiently that there should have been such
an abundance of Mercy that the Court would have seen this individual
innocent despite the incriminating evidence. The pain and tragedy
brought upon this person would have been averted.
The
lesson that we are able to draw to ourselves from the fate of the Kohen
Gadol is that whenever a person has the ability to help another individual
through prayer (tefillah) to evoke Rachamim (Hashems Mercy) or through
action and he does not, there is a degree of culpability to that individual.
If we are able to pray to Hashem to sensitize the hearts of the Jews
who have been alienated to Judaism and we do not, what is our level
of culpability? Each of our tefillos could have a profound impact on
all existence. Of course the Kohen Gadol is the most qualified individual
to evoke the Mercy and Kindness of Hashem; however, we all as Jews (who
are all interconnected with one another) have the ability to affect
one another in a very positive way. The fact that we see that the needs
of the Klal Yisroel are so great in many areas of our Jewish existence
is an indication that we must all pray more, study more Torah, and do
more acts of kindness.
About
the Yad Avraham Institute
The Yad Avraham
is a Torah learning institute located on the 47th floor of
the Time Life Building in Manhattan. Classes are offered starting at
5:50am every day during the week and throughout the day. Classes in
Chumash, Halacha, Hashkofa, Gemara, and general topics are well attended
by businessmen, students, and professionals. The Yad Avraham would like
to invite you to participate in our extensive offerings of classes and
events.
www.yadavraham.org
Please visit our web page http://www.kehilasmy.org
Buy books with 10% off from Artscroll and Artscroll will donate us 5% of your purchase:
[an error occurred while processing this directive]